On October
2, 2012, USA Today published an article “U.S. Needs Paid Family Leave” written
by Duncan Black. In his article, he
discusses how the United States should have paid parental leave not only
working moms but working fathers as he discovered during a trip to Sweden.
I believe Mr.
Black intended audience is targeted at new parents, soon-to-be parents and
future parents as he mentions the “gender equity in the workplace and at home”. As Mr. Black supports the paid parental leave,
he believes it affects the parents jobs and paychecks if not in place. As a
parent, I disagree with Mr. Black’s opinion because the Federal Family and
Medical Leave Act exist for parents.
Employers would not fire an employee based on a birth of a child and the
need to care for an infant. This is why
the leave act exist. I am fortunate to
work for the government which has sick and vacation time for me to accrue and
use during my absence. Mr. Black
mentions people who choose not have children or unable for whatever reasons but
states it part of life and newbie parents should receive a paycheck. It is a choice to become parents or not, but
those people who do not or never will have children will not benefit from this
leave. The government should not adopt
the paid leave regardless of who it will benefit. I would leave it to the employer to make the
call of such leave. Mr. Black does not
have children and should not speak of something he has no knowledge of.
No comments:
Post a Comment